chiamanti in correità

07:47 May 1, 2017 

I think co-plaintiffs might be the best option. I'm not a legal expert but it is certainly a term which comes up in searches as does joint plaintiffs. Thanks for all the comments.

09:59 Apr 30, 2017 

co-plaintiffs for chiamanti of course but would it make any sense?

09:27 Apr 30, 2017 

co-defendants
but of course you judge according to full context

17:02 Apr 29, 2017 

I think this is about the credibility of proposed (chiamata) corrections of alleged utterances. But here are a number of court opinions on the subject, whatever it is.

http://www.iussit.com/valutazione-della-prova-chiamata-corre...

15:21 Apr 29, 2017 

You are right Phil. I read "chiamati", but the word in the source text is actually "chiamanti". I will hide the answer.

15:18 Apr 29, 2017 

Could it be a typo for "chiamati"? If so, you may be correct in saying that's it's "co-accused", Marco, but you haven't given any references.
Here's the article referred to in Judith's text:
Le dichiarazioni rese dal coimputato del medesimo
reato o da persona imputata in un procedimento
connesso a norma dell'articolo 12 sono valutate
unitamente agli altri elementi di prova che ne
confermano l'attendibilità.

15:10 Apr 29, 2017 

I'm not even sure what "chiamanti" means. Claimants? The only dictionary meaning I can find is caller, as in telephone.
We had this in Italian to French, and the answer (with no references or explanation) was "demandeur complice", which means nothing to me.
http://www.proz.com/kudoz/italian_to_french/law_general/5721...