GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
11:09 Feb 15, 2007 |
German to English translations [PRO] Bus/Financial - Finance (general) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Kieran McCann United Kingdom Local time: 14:15 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | the discrepancy between aspiration and reality or the credibility gap |
| ||
3 +1 | earnings shortfall or credibility gap |
|
Ergebnisluecke oder Vertrauensluecke the discrepancy between aspiration and reality or the credibility gap Explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility_gap http://tinyurl.com/2bn4dj -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 39 mins (2007-02-15 11:49:21 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Alt: 'performance or credibility gap' (see below) |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Ergebnisluecke oder Vertrauensluecke earnings shortfall or credibility gap Explanation: Nothing wrong with Andrew's answer as a general take, and 'Ergebnislücke' is certainly used in a general sense to mean falling short of any kind of objective. The context, however, (http://www.sternstewart.de/files/STE_Studie35_Zukunftsf14.pd... page 6) makes it clear that both terms relate to investors' over- or under-expectations of a company's performance and that 'Ergebnis' here is specifically 'earnings'. I prefer 'earnings shortfall' to 'earnings gap' (even though 'earnings shortfall' is usually meant in relation to a specific target/budget rather than general expectations) because the latter is nearly always used in relation to differences in salary/pay. On the other hand, 'earnings gap' is better for symmetry (important since, believe it or not, both terms are actually plotted against each other on a graph) and probably OK as well. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 1 hr (2007-02-15 12:18:06 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- An errant comma has upset the link which is: http://www.sternstewart.de/files/STE_Studie35_Zukunftsf14.pd... |
| |
Grading comment
| ||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.